There are many ways to code documents in qualitative research. Here are a couple you may not have thought of.
I code using word. I insert the codes into a copy of a transcript. Then I used Google desktop to locate the coded segments.
Alankaar Sharma, a Ph.D. students at the SSW, University of Minnesota, uses the comment function of work for coding as well as NVivo.
Valandra, a Ph.D. student at the U of Minnesota, uses word's table function and puts the code in the left column, the text in the center, and observer comments/memos on the right side. The entire manuscript is in the center column.
Any of these or a combination might work. Remember, researchers are the central processors of qualitative texts.
When I first did qualitative text analysis, I used Ethnograph, but after a few years I found that the core concepts and key ideas were in my head and the segments I coded far too big and in some ways unclassifiable because their meanings change as my perspectives change. I fell back on coding in word.
Many researchers who have been at it for years no longer use specialized software for coding.
In writing proposals, it would be a good idea to state the specific software program you are using. If you have space, also describe the functions that are relevant to your proposed research.
Showing posts with label coding. Show all posts
Showing posts with label coding. Show all posts
Wednesday, May 21, 2008
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)